The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Tournament of Rapists
The Clay That Woke
Deep Carbon Observatory
Star Trader
The Keepers of the Woods
A Song of Ice and Fire Roleplaying
Itras By
Monster Squad Control
A Red & Pleasant Land
Dragon Age Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook
Microscope
Player's Handbook (D&D 5e)
DayTrippers: Core Rules
Low Life: The Rise of the Lowly (ReDredged)
Shadow of the Demon Lord Core Rulebook
Rise of the Red God
Mecha Mice
Trail of Cthulhu
A Song of Ice and Fire Campaign Guide
d20 Modern Core Book
Bloodsucker: The Angst
Player Essentials: Heroes of the Forgotten Kingdoms
Racial Holy War
Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Core Rulebook
Dream Askew
Scarlet Heroes
Titansgrave: The Ashes of Valkana
Chrome Flesh
Call of Cthulhu (5th Edition)
The Succubus Club
Delta Green
Adventures Unlimited (Issue 1 - Spring 1995)
Dungeon Master Guide (AD&D 2e Revised)
Monsterhearts
Dungeon Crawl Classics Role Playing Game
Humans vs. Monsters: Diplomacy (Generic)
Lasers and Feelings: The Doubleclicks Tribute RPG
Tianxia: Blood, Silk & Jade
Star Wars: Force and Destiny Core Rulebook
Occult Bestiary
Disaster at Monongah Mining Company
The Dinner Guests
Bloody Reunion
Dreams in the Deep
The Barreville Flap
The Gatherer of Nightmares
Deluxe Tunnels & Trolls
PowerFrame Core Rulebook
James Bond 007
Fear Itself
Recommend
29 
 Thumb up
 Hide
9 Posts

The One Ring» Forums » Reviews

Subject: The One Ring Review rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Chris Farrell
United States
Cupertino
California
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
I threw in the towel on D&D (3, 3.5 and 4, plus Pathfinder) a couple years ago and switched my roleplaying energies to Gumshoe, a decision I'm quite happy with. But, as is usual with these things, I didn't bring along all the friends I game with. For players who like the tactical combat, detailed character building, and the die-rolling of D&D or Pathfinder, Gumshoe is not going to be in their wheelhouse.

So I'm always on the lookout for somewhere we can meet in the middle. A game, probably a fantasy game, that has interesting combat with plenty of die-rolling but doesn't get bogged down in minutia and can be enjoyed more in the quick-playing, systems-light style. Something that has plenty of skills and feat-like-things, but that still taps into the more improvisational RPG aesthetic. The One Ring looked perfect.

Not that I came to that conclusion right away though. I picked up The One Ring: Adventures over the Edge of the Wild after it got some buzz from GenCon 2011 despite the fact that Tolkien roleplaying games in general have a rather sorry history, mainly because of my Tolkien fandom and because it was through Sophisticated Games, which has a good track record with licensed products. Unfortunately, The One Ring's two core books are incoherent: rules presented in almost random order, topics split between sections and between both books and fully explained nowhere, paragraphs that give up their meaning only after intense textual analysis – it's really terrible. After doing my initial read I shelved it feeling like it was making the right noises, but having little idea what the game was trying to do. It was only once I picked it up again six months later and plowed through it on a mission that I figured out what the game was about.

It's a nice blend of ideas. The skill check system is straightforward: you roll against target numbers with a single d12 Fate die, plus one regular d6 for each rank you have in the skill. There are a few nuances built in to the custom dice: the d6s have a Tengwar rune for an exceptional success on the 6, and the 1-3 faces are shaded and count for zero if you are weary. The big variance on the Fate die makes it possible for more or less anyone to succeed (albeit rarely) at many things, but it takes skill to get the exceptional successes that trigger bonuses. The probability curve is rather nice and gives you real flexibility as the GM with target numbers; there are big differences between how characters with various ranks in skills will feel about targets of 10, 12, 14, or 16. The rules for Weariness, zeroing out your d6 rolls of 1 through 3, are very clean but impactful, and make tasks a lot harder but don't make impossible anything you could accomplish when well-rested.

This solid skill check system then works quite well in combat, which is abstract but has good texture. Each combat round you choose how closely you are going to engage, which affects both how easy it will be for you to hit the enemy as well as how easily they hit you. Each range bracket has a special action associated with it (intimidate, rally, protect, aim), and there are other standard combat options (called shots, accepting knockback) which provide some choices and are thematic. Additionally, it's nice to see attention to workable rules for disengaging and fleeing from combat, a common occurrence in the books. Also nice is that enemies have a Hate rating which both powers their special abilities and is a proxy for morale, giving the GM an explicit cue for when the bad guys break and run away themselves. Still, despite the solid mechanical support here, combat is still pretty abstract and nowhere near as tactically detailed as many would probably like. Gumshoe has always relied on the players to be a little more imaginative than just saying "I shoot him. I'll spend 2 shooting points. I hit. I do 6 points of damage". You don't need involved narration for every combat roll, but it's in the hands of the players to bring the action to life. The One Ring gives players much more support than Gumshoe does in terms of structure to hang some narration on, but it will still get repetitive and feel flat unless players can engage with it and flesh it out through colorful description.

This is all good and well-designed, but where does the players' real narrative authority kick in? Characters in The One Ring have Traits (which can be Specialties, which are like backgrounds, or Distinctive Features, which are more like personality traits), which serve some of the same game functions as FATE's Aspects or Gumshoe's investigative skills. They are little bits of description that if you can integrate in to what you're trying to accomplish with a skill, you get a significant bonus – sometimes an auto-success, sometimes an extra experience point. There is no token economy backing this up as in FATE – you can earn the bonus as often as you can do it – and neither is as integral to the system as Trail of Cthulhu's Drives which have a hard link to a character's Sanity. It's more akin to the Technothriller Monologue and similar cherries in Night's Black Agents. Give a little narration that invokes your trait and pleases the GM and the other players, and you get a bonus. My only complaint is that I think a number of The One Ring's pre-packaged Traits can be problematic. Some of them are just hard to work into adventuring sorts of actions without straining something (Fishing?). Others, while perhaps thematic, are problematic from a game perspective as they can feed bad group dynamics (Secretive, Suspicious, or Wilful will be grabbed immediately by your player who enjoys hosing the party or abusing the gaming social contract).

In practice, while Traits are simple, work, and I like them, nonetheless they didn't exert much pull on the imaginations of my fellow-players. Perhaps the off-the-shelf ones were too vague and not generally useful enough, or the benefits of using them are not as crisp and clear as FATE's Fate points. I suspect a combination. If you have a group that likes and has some experience with these sorts of player narrative hooks I'm sure it'll be fine, but I suspect for groups trying to make the switch form D&D, GURPS, or Call of Cthulhu there might not be enough direction here.

More practical and useful I think are a few conventions and pointers for GMs. One key bit is that skill checks are resolved in a somewhat non-traditional way: first, as a player state what you are trying to accomplish; second, roll the dice; and finally, narrate your character's actions and the outcome, maybe with the help of the GM. This is a simple thing but makes for a much more satisfactory narrative, especially for social skills. How often have you framed, say, a Diplomacy check by narrating a suave approach and a persuasive argument only to fumble the die roll? It becomes hard to climb down at that point and narrate an interesting and plausible failure. This is a good habit to get into with any game I think, but The One Ring's easy skill check details for extraordinary successes and fumbles supports it especially well. It also allows the characters more narrative control over both how they succeed and how they fail, which can be fun. Watch out though for the players who are too possessive and have a hard time narrating failure for their characters, instead trying to twist a failed die roll into an uncomplicated narrative success, but I suspect we can agree not to blame the system for that.

Beyond these core ideas, The One Ring provides a lot of mechanical support for adventuring in Tolkien's world. There is a nice journeying sub-game for long trips which folds into the weariness system and provides a good way to hook in "random" encounters along the way when players blow rolls. Hope gives a way for characters to boost rolls, but spend too much Hope and you may gain a Shadow-Weaknesses, a Trait that works more to your disadvantage. The mix of wounds, weariness, and loss of hope inflicted by combat is much more thematic and interesting than just tracking hit points. The advancement system is point-buy, but the way experience points are awarded is quite clever – you get them for skill checks, but you can't rack them up for using a single strong skill, you need to use a range of skills of different types. While the game is definitely what I'd consider lightweight, there is some detail to it. Unfortunately, I have to come back to the wretched books which make the game seem far more complicated than it really is. The first time we played, we were frequently flipping pages (and thrashing with the useless index) to find simple concepts. I ended up having to read both books cover to cover a third time, taking notes, to build up a reference card with a summary of all the systems just to make the game playable (here it is). It's only one page front and back in a large-ish font – this is a simple game with a truly terrible ruleset.

The last thing to talk about is the inherent difficulty associated with gaming in the worlds of J R R Tolkien. I think The One Ring has done a good job in hewing to the feel of the books, and I think focusing on the period and style of The Hobbit more than The Lord of the Rings is the right choice. The Hobbit makes more fertile ground for lighter, fun, action-adventure games, while The Lord of the Rings is complicated by its truly epic scale and the fact that anything you might do is vastly less important than whatever the Fellowship is up to. Still, even focusing on The Hobbit, the problem is that like the Cthulhu Mythos every reader finds something different in Tolkien and decades of bad knock-offs have polluted the environment, so it can be hard for everyone to be on the same page style-wise. How many battles do the heroes of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings actually initiate? None as far as I can remember – they're all defensive engagements, or running battles with the heroes trying to escape. But a million D&D set-pieces where dwarves and elves and men take the battle to the bad guys (and loot their stuff) makes balancing expectations complicated. I really enjoy reading the parts of the Ashen Stars and Night's Black Agents rules where Robin Laws and Kenneth Hite talk quite specifically about how stories are structured in their game worlds, what the themes are and how to keep the characters moving. Something along these lines for The One Ring would have been hugely helpful, as the adventures provided in the rulebook and the Tales from Wilderland sourcebook are mediocre. Tolkien is not about escorting hapless two-bit merchants through Mirkwood for a flat fee. Perhaps an equivalent of the Cthulhu Mythos' "purist" vs. "pulp" would be helpful here.

Bottom line for me: as a person intrigued by game systems and how they tweak players and enable different play styles, I liked The One Ring a lot and it overcame my inherent skepticism about the gameability of Tolkien. The dice system is terrific, the combat system is light-ish but thematic and interesting and with some subtlety, and the game is faithful to the books. Unfortunately the supports for the good game mechanics are not very good. The books are atrociously put together. The adventures are at best OK. The vital Traits are a mixed bag. There is little help for the GM in terms of the nitty-gritty of designing adventures, and crucially little practical guidance on the complicated questions of style and how to game Tolkien in a way that's fun. As good as the game system is, and as I much as I hope The One Ring can find a niche in my roleplaying rotation, these practical obstacles are significant and I fear I need to keep looking for something reliable to fill the gap between D&D and Gumshoe. Maybe 13th Age will fill the bill.

---

This piece originally appeared on my blog, Illuminating Games.
34 
 Thumb up
1.50
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Chris Barlow
United States
Fort Collins
Colorado
flag msg tools
The greatest political storm flutters only a fringe of humanity. But an ordinary man and an ordinary woman and their ordinary children literally alter the destiny of nations. - GK Chesterton
mbmbmbmbmb
Hi cfarrell,

Thanks for the review.

You must have visited C7's forum before, correct?
Some of the missing things have been filled in by them, and actually moreso, by the fans.

Here is an expanded Index: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/2012/07/the-one-ring-extended-inde...

And may I recommend this fans material? He has written seriously excellent stuff for TOR, including a "Loremaster's guide to Narrating Tolkien", "the LMs guide to Mythic Battles" (highly recommended), and a campaign one could run. http://advancementpoints.blogspot.com/p/the-one-ring.html

Finally, here is a link to many TOR resources on their forum site: http://cubicle7.clicdev.com/f/index.php?trk=cubicle7&showtop...

I agree with you though. This is a great game and evokes Middle Earth better than any other game I've played, but it is poorly organized and has received more support from the fans than the publisher. I'm thankful for dedicated fans. The fact that C7 (probably had to) pulled the PDFs from the market didn't help the line either.
15 
 Thumb up
1.25
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Francisco Bustos
Chile
Santiago
Región Metropolitana
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Great review, I liked it, specially the part about story style, I totally agree. I would like to have read something about 'Encounters' rules.
5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Rob Doupe
Canada
Calgary
Alberta
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Quote:
Unfortunately, I have to come back to the wretched books which make the game seem far more complicated than it really is. The first time we played, we were frequently flipping pages (and thrashing with the useless index) to find simple concepts. I ended up having to read both books cover to cover a third time, taking notes, to build up a reference card with a summary of all the systems just to make the game playable (here it is). It's only one page front and back in a large-ish font – this is a simple game with a truly terrible ruleset.


We played last weekend for the first time, and this was the biggest problem. Straightforward, common concepts like Fatigue are spread out over three locations in two books. The players book has one sequence of play for combat, and the loremasters book has another, but neither explain Initiative (that's in a different section altogether). The mechanics for Journeying are spread out over three locations in two books. And so on. Thanks for making the reference - I was assuming I'd have to spend a few hours and make one myself.

Oh, and the GM screen does not help at all. Not a single one of the 20 or so tables on the screen came up during our 5 hours of play. None of the dozen or so most common systems in the game are represented on the screen.

3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Shaun
United States
Chicago
Illinois
flag msg tools
I want to like this System sooo much, but I totally agree with this review. The Rule Books are laid out terribly. It's frustrating to have to read the rules 3 times. I don't know how this game system won so many awards.

The adventures in Tales are pretty good I thought, but my main gripe is...what can your PC's really do? This game is land-locked in ME and there's only so much that can be done. It seems like this system is meant for an occassional play.

Support from the Publisher is awful. As in...there doesn't seem to be any at the moment.

The production value though? Simply fantastic!!
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
ErikPeter Walker
United States
Rochester
Minnesota
flag msg tools
designer
boardgamegeek.com/boardgameexpansion/145148/
badge
Expand
mbmbmbmb
Good review. Instead of writing my own, I'll chime in here.

From a player's perspective, it is easy enough to grasp that I wouldn't call the books "atrocious", but I will echo that the presentation of information is clearly the worst part about the game. Even looking at your useful rules summary it looks like you made some mistakes (you gain fatigue on a journey, you don't lose endurance) and I can't blame you.

Despite the confusing layout, I love how it plays. Graduating from a D&D campaign the system has really challenged us to actually role-play a little bit. And it captures the spirit of low-magic fantasy so well: The combat feels thematic, and dangerous, but enjoyably hack-and-slashy; the hope/shadow dynamic creates an interesting tension between struggling to succeed and not wanting to bottom out; character differences help define a player's role in the narrative more than in combat; the fellowship matters, just enough; every fight we've had felt tense and exciting.

I think the preliminary adventures are unexciting on the surface, but they're very well presented and, for our group at least, they simply served as a narrative backbone to be fleshed out by our unpredictable actions. The GM has to improvise a bit when we go off the beaten path, but like I said, I love how it plays. In half a dozen sessions, I'd put two of them on my "best sessions ever" list, and that's working with characters we're only just growing attached to.

And I love the character building options--so it's unfortunate that building a character requires a hop-skip-jump through 3/4 of the book.
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Chris Barlow
United States
Fort Collins
Colorado
flag msg tools
The greatest political storm flutters only a fringe of humanity. But an ordinary man and an ordinary woman and their ordinary children literally alter the destiny of nations. - GK Chesterton
mbmbmbmbmb
Quote:
And I love the character building options--so it's unfortunate that building a character requires a hop-skip-jump through 3/4 of the book.

Please tell me you know about the online character builder?!
It's free and makes character creation so easy. You still need the book because it doesn't give you all of the information about the culture (it does have ALL the text for the backgrounds, Cultural Ability, Virtues, Rewards), but it greatly simplifies the process.

http://azrapse.es/tor/sheet.html

Check it out if you have not already...

4 
 Thumb up
0.05
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Brian Jones
United States
Charlotte
North Carolina
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Sir Christopher wrote:
Hi cfarrell,

Thanks for the review.

You must have visited C7's forum before, correct?
Some of the missing things have been filled in by them, and actually moreso, by the fans.

Here is an expanded Index: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/2012/07/the-one-ring-extended-inde...

And may I recommend this fans material? He has written seriously excellent stuff for TOR, including a "Loremaster's guide to Narrating Tolkien", "the LMs guide to Mythic Battles" (highly recommended), and a campaign one could run. http://advancementpoints.blogspot.com/p/the-one-ring.html

Finally, here is a link to many TOR resources on their forum site: http://cubicle7.clicdev.com/f/index.php?trk=cubicle7&showtop...

I agree with you though. This is a great game and evokes Middle Earth better than any other game I've played, but it is poorly organized and has received more support from the fans than the publisher. I'm thankful for dedicated fans. The fact that C7 (probably had to) pulled the PDFs from the market didn't help the line either.


Thanks very much for those links, very helpful. Here's a tip! and I love Le Petit Prince avatar
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Chris Barlow
United States
Fort Collins
Colorado
flag msg tools
The greatest political storm flutters only a fringe of humanity. But an ordinary man and an ordinary woman and their ordinary children literally alter the destiny of nations. - GK Chesterton
mbmbmbmbmb
You're welcome, and thanks!
It is a very good, poignant story. (Le Petit Prince, that is)

 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.